Message-ID: <384835.1075855013341.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:59:36 -0800 (PST)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: lindy.donoho@enron.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, 
	kevin.hyatt@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, 
	k.lohman@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, 
	linda.trevino@enron.com, elizabeth.brown@enron.com, 
	glen.hass@enron.com, kay.miller@enron.com, mary.darveaux@enron.com, 
	martha.cormier@enron.com
Subject: CHECKLIST FOR NEGOTIATED RATE DEALS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Scott, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SSCOTT3>
X-To: Donoho, Lindy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ldonoho>, Fawcett, Jeffery </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jfawcet>, Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=65b627bc-84e5435e-862566de-1137ee>, Hyatt, Kevin </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Khyatt>, Lindberg, Lorraine </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Llindbe>, Lohman, Therese K </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tlohman>, Lokay, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mlokay>, Trevino, Linda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=80f47425-6fd873a8-862566d4-4bc44a>, Brown, Elizabeth </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=96799042-2cde79a2-862566d4-550898>, Hass, Glen </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=c6b372d0-6f90c726-862566aa-6a315a>, Miller, Mary Kay </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=59406cf-4a8787c-862566de-280aa>, Darveaux, Mary </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=e6ccf31-98d49671-862566dd-637d30>, Cormier, Martha </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=93b38763-837e8bf8-862566a6-55f516>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MLOKAY (Non-Privileged)\TW-Commercial Group
X-Origin: Lokay-M
X-FileName: MLOKAY (Non-Privileged).pst

Here is a checklist for negotiated rate deals.  It basically just states in writing the procedures we've discussed.  One exception:  Elizabeth, Linda and Michelle, please note that we've decided reference to Sheets Nos. 5B.05, et seq. is sufficient.  If you have questions please let me know.  Thanks!

Susan (x30596)

 